Peer Review Process

IBDA’: Jurnal Kajian Islam dan Budaya maintain the standards of peer review while increasing the efficiency of the process.

All research articles published in IBDA’: Jurnal Kajian Islam dan Budaya undergo full peer review, key characteristics of which are listed below:

Peer review of referred papers:

Editors of IBDA’: Jurnal Kajian Islam dan Budaya will decide promptly whether to accept, reject, or request revisions of referred papers based on the reviews and editorial insight of the supporting journals. In addition, Editors will have the option of seeking additional reviews when needed. Authors will be advised when Editors decide further review is needed.


Peer review of novel submissions:

Articles submitted directly to IBDA’: Jurnal Kajian Islam dan Budaya will be fully peer reviewed by at least two appropriately qualified experts in the field selected by the Editor-in-Chief. The Editor-in-Chief or a designated member of the Editorial Board will then decide whether to accept, reject or request revisions based on the reviews and comments received.
Editors will decide whether each submission reports well-conducted research with conclusions supported by the data presented in the paper. Assessments of priority will not be a factor in decision-making, but all papers must make an incremental or novel addition to the literature.