Recommendations of The Ombudsman’s Dilemma: Between Law Enforcement Officials and Protection of Credibility

  • Dyah Adriantini Sintha Dewi University of Muhammadiyah Magelang
Keywords: recommendations, ombudsman, law enforcement, credibility of officials

Abstract

The Ombudsman as an external oversight body for official performance, in Fikih Siyasah (constitutionality in Islam) is included in the supervision stipulated in legislation (al-musahabah al-qomariyah). Supervision is done so that public service delivery to the community is in accordance with the rights of the community. This is done because in carrying out its duties, officials are very likely to conduct mal administration, which is bad public services that cause harm to the community. The Ombudsman is an institution authorized to resolve the mal administration issue, in which one of its products is by issuing a recommendation. Although Law No. 37 of 2018 on the Ombudsman of the Republic of Indonesia states that the recommendation is mandatory, theombudsman's recommendations have not been implemented. This is due to differences in point of view, ie on the one hand in the context of law enforcement, but on the other hand the implementation of the recommendation is considered as a means of opening the disgrace of officials. Recommendations are the last alternative of Ombudsman's efforts to resolve the mal administration case, given that a win-win solution is the goal, then mediation becomes the main effort. This is in accordance with the condition of the Muslim majority of Indonesian nation and prioritizes deliberation in resolving dispute. Therefore, it is necessary to educate the community and officials related to the implementation of the Ombudsman's recommendations in order to provide good public services for the community, which is the obligation of the government.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anonymous, Law Number 37 2008 on the Ombudsman of the Republic of Indonesia.
Faisal, S. (1990). Qualitative research, basics and applications. Malang: YA3.
Huberman, MB (1992). Qualitative Data Analysis. Jakarta: UI Press.
Hulu, S. (2016, January Friday). Assistant Ombudsman Representative of Central Java.
Like, I. (2016, January Saturday). Head of Legal Magelang regency.
Like, I. (2016, January Tuesday). Head of Legal Magelang regency.
Masthuri, B. (2005). Know the Indonesian Ombudsman. Jakarta PT Pradnya Paramita.
Moleong, LJ (1995). Qualitative Research Methodology. Bandung: Rosdakarya.
Norman Yvonna S K Denzin & Lincoln. (2009). Handbook of Qualitative Research. Yogyakarta: Student Library.
Panjikeris. (2016, December Sunday). Karl Popper's falsification theory. Retrieved from https://panjikeris.wordpress.com
Shidarta, SI (2011). Constellation Legal Research Methods and Reflection. Jakarta: Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia.
Sujata, A. (2002). Ombudsman Indonesia Current and Future. Jakarta: The National Ombudsman Commission.
Sutedi, A. (2007). Implementation of the Public Interest, in a land acquisition for development. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Tanjung, MS (2003). Operation management. Jakarta: Grasindo.
Tanjung, MS (2003). Operations management. Jakarta: Grasindo.
Wahyuana, JS (2016, January Tuesday). Assistant Ombudsman Representative DIY.
Zulfifani. (2016, July Friday). EMIC and Ethics in Ethnographic. Retrieved from https://zulfifani.wrdpress.com
Published
2018-04-23
How to Cite
Dewi, D. (2018). Recommendations of The Ombudsman’s Dilemma: Between Law Enforcement Officials and Protection of Credibility. International Conference of Moslem Society, 2, 1-12. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24090/icms.2018.1809